<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SolarPlexus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus</link>
	<description>Reaction from the gut.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  9 Feb 2010 13:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Devilish chicanery by Jez</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=481#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=481#comment-68</guid>
		<description>You'll like this one :)

http://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=15559.msg286300#msg286300</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll like this one :)</p>
<p><a href="http://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=15559.msg286300#msg286300" >http://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=15559.msg286300#msg286300</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Devilish chicanery by DocDelete</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=481#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>DocDelete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=481#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Indeed. I think the fact that Daniel was prosecuted in the first place is bad enough. I find it disheartening that a copper 'at street level' seemed to have had a common-sense bypass, and further that the CPS didn't tell Mr PC to ditch the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. I think the fact that Daniel was prosecuted in the first place is bad enough. I find it disheartening that a copper &#8216;at street level&#8217; seemed to have had a common-sense bypass, and further that the CPS didn&#8217;t tell Mr PC to ditch the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Devilish chicanery by Jez</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=481#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=481#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Jobbies like this do nobody any good. The only possible result of using one is to create a conflict between a cyclist and a following motorist which otherwise wouldn't have happened.  I'm willing to bet that the the council's cycling officer (assuming Solihull has such a thing) didn't ask for them.

Daniel Cadden's case went to a re-trial and he was acquitted.  The judge who originally convicted him was the same chap who acquitted a police driver who spanged around at 160mph.  I get the feeling that Judge Morgan and Shropshire Police's grasp of road traffic law needed a bit of brush up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jobbies like this do nobody any good. The only possible result of using one is to create a conflict between a cyclist and a following motorist which otherwise wouldn&#8217;t have happened.  I&#8217;m willing to bet that the the council&#8217;s cycling officer (assuming Solihull has such a thing) didn&#8217;t ask for them.</p>
<p>Daniel Cadden&#8217;s case went to a re-trial and he was acquitted.  The judge who originally convicted him was the same chap who acquitted a police driver who spanged around at 160mph.  I get the feeling that Judge Morgan and Shropshire Police&#8217;s grasp of road traffic law needed a bit of brush up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BBC Radio 4 now, Count Arthur &#8230; by DocDelete</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=444#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>DocDelete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=444#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Eloquently put Robert Stirling. I stand humbled by your insight and wit.

My mistake: you are, of course, correct. I really don't know what came over me. I've re-evaluated my position and now I find The Count Arthur Radio Show to be a veritable font of innovative humour. It truly does carve a new path in the landscape of British comedy. Moreover, it's clever use of hoary old routines, combined with lacklustre delivery, is surely intentional, and a parody of lesser material produced by other talent. People like Arthur Askey must be spinning in their graves, in green fugues of envy.

No, hang on a mo' - I'm wrong again: the programme /is/ twaddle. And /you're/ a twat ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eloquently put Robert Stirling. I stand humbled by your insight and wit.</p>
<p>My mistake: you are, of course, correct. I really don&#8217;t know what came over me. I&#8217;ve re-evaluated my position and now I find The Count Arthur Radio Show to be a veritable font of innovative humour. It truly does carve a new path in the landscape of British comedy. Moreover, it&#8217;s clever use of hoary old routines, combined with lacklustre delivery, is surely intentional, and a parody of lesser material produced by other talent. People like Arthur Askey must be spinning in their graves, in green fugues of envy.</p>
<p>No, hang on a mo&#8217; - I&#8217;m wrong again: the programme /is/ twaddle. And /you&#8217;re/ a twat ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BBC Radio 4 now, Count Arthur &#8230; by Robert Stirling</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=444#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stirling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=444#comment-56</guid>
		<description>You're a twat! It's brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a twat! It&#8217;s brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stroll on! by Swu</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=77#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Swu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=77#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Yup, we're preparing a new generation of softies.  Just the other day, I found myself trimming the fat from a few rashers of bacon, prior to making a roll for my daughter.  In my day, the bacon roll would've also contained the pig's ar$e, and most likely, half of its face.  And the fat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, we&#8217;re preparing a new generation of softies.  Just the other day, I found myself trimming the fat from a few rashers of bacon, prior to making a roll for my daughter.  In my day, the bacon roll would&#8217;ve also contained the pig&#8217;s ar$e, and most likely, half of its face.  And the fat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nerd test by DocDelete</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=67#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>DocDelete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=67#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Hi Baron, presumably to get 100% you'd need to know the exact date that Fat Freddy's Cat was neutered. I didn't, so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Baron, presumably to get 100% you&#8217;d need to know the exact date that Fat Freddy&#8217;s Cat was neutered. I didn&#8217;t, so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nerd test by The Baron</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=67#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>The Baron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=67#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Only 96% for the comics bit...wonder what you have to do to get 100%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 96% for the comics bit&#8230;wonder what you have to do to get 100%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get Shatner! by Richard Madeley</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=57#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Madeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccgi.twotee.free-online.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=57#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Shatner is a god in this house. Excellent link. Consider yourself blogrolled!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shatner is a god in this house. Excellent link. Consider yourself blogrolled!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carol Mansley by Gill Ranson</title>
		<link>http://www.davidson-igd.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=43#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Gill Ranson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccgi.twotee.free-online.co.uk/solarplexus/?p=43#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Joining Scintilla as the earliest member of the 'employed' team, I witnessed many changes in 7 years within this small organisation.    However, before I left the company it was evident that a very strong core dynamic of people had emerged.    Carol's arrival had strengthened that dynamic with her obvious talent and intellect, and a distinctively different personality, and I echo all Ken's words above.

However, my own personal memories of Carol have been brought to the surface with a jolt on reading this terribly sad news.    Our working relationship (Carol as Production Manager and I in sales) was always a good one;  Carol's quiet, dry sense of humour was always near the surface, even when fairly heavy discussions  were taking place.      She was one of the most modest, laid-back, unflappable people I have met, but her sense of fun bubbled underneath all this much of the time.  Her unique, and sometimes wicked, style of sending people up was unrivalled!    At the same time, her work ethic was always a serious, dedicated approach.   During the time we worked together she was unerringly supportive and as is inevitable in a small team, everyone was always reliant on one another.   Carol was a clear leader and never let you down.    I admired her a lot.

Yes, difficult to fathom sometimes, and a very private person,       However, I remember when she bought her first house and we went there together one lunch time, zipping along in her red Peugeot 205, it was a happy time.

Carol had the most amazing laugh, amazing hair and was an amazingly good colleague.    This news is such a shock, and I am so sad to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joining Scintilla as the earliest member of the &#8216;employed&#8217; team, I witnessed many changes in 7 years within this small organisation.    However, before I left the company it was evident that a very strong core dynamic of people had emerged.    Carol&#8217;s arrival had strengthened that dynamic with her obvious talent and intellect, and a distinctively different personality, and I echo all Ken&#8217;s words above.</p>
<p>However, my own personal memories of Carol have been brought to the surface with a jolt on reading this terribly sad news.    Our working relationship (Carol as Production Manager and I in sales) was always a good one;  Carol&#8217;s quiet, dry sense of humour was always near the surface, even when fairly heavy discussions  were taking place.      She was one of the most modest, laid-back, unflappable people I have met, but her sense of fun bubbled underneath all this much of the time.  Her unique, and sometimes wicked, style of sending people up was unrivalled!    At the same time, her work ethic was always a serious, dedicated approach.   During the time we worked together she was unerringly supportive and as is inevitable in a small team, everyone was always reliant on one another.   Carol was a clear leader and never let you down.    I admired her a lot.</p>
<p>Yes, difficult to fathom sometimes, and a very private person,       However, I remember when she bought her first house and we went there together one lunch time, zipping along in her red Peugeot 205, it was a happy time.</p>
<p>Carol had the most amazing laugh, amazing hair and was an amazingly good colleague.    This news is such a shock, and I am so sad to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
